A squash-friendly blog for our times
Thursday, February 27, 2003
. The fourth race of the America's Cup
final has, at last
, been completed, and the Swiss have taken a 4-0 lead
. Added bonus: Click on the link about the race, and be dazzled by use of the word "dismasted."
Wednesday, February 26, 2003
: India has defeated England
in the Cricket World Cup
, virtually guaranteeing itself a spot in the next round. England, by contrast, must now somehow beat the world's top team, Australia, in order to have a good chance at advancing.
The photography on this Yale sophomore's weblog
is stunning. (I particularly like the photograph of a staircase
posted on February 23.) I noticed the site a few days ago, but I forgot to mention it. Yes, more amnesia
. Happily enough, Ernie the Attorney reminded me
I don't know what's up
with me right now. All of my blog entries lately have been, well, condensed
. In an effort to work through that, here's a mega post on the sports issues that I'm interested in today. First, Australian cricketer Shane Warne
, who was suspended last week
for using a banned diuretic has decided that he will not appeal
. Race 4 of the America's Cup
has been cancelled for the seventh
time. This time the culprit was rough seas
. Baseball's new Veterans Committee
had an election today, and there were no winners
. And, finally, if you're planning on protesting at this years Masters Tournament
, you'd better get in line now
Like sand through the hourglass
: I agree with Shattered Buddha
, this photographic chronology of a family
is strangely compelling.
Tuesday, February 25, 2003
As anybody who has ever lived there
can attest, Louisiana is sinking
. Still, this piece made me miss New Orleans....
Monday, February 24, 2003
This isn't true every day, but today's posts are a pretty good representation of who I am and what I'm interested in. Just in case you were wondering.
It's true: History is cyclical
. Some of the same dissatisfactions that led one generation of men's tennis players to form the ATP Tour
are now leading a new generation to consider forming another union—to negotiate with the old union. Odd, huh? My favorite tennis journalist, Jon Wertheim, has the skinny in this Q&A with SI.com
Greece to IOC
: Take a chill pill
. Ok, I'm paraphrasing there....
This is the El Niño America's Cup
Pete Rose and the Hall of Fame?
It's not quite
what you're thinking.
Kenya's startling upset of Sri Lanka
today in the Cricket World Cup
was not good news
for New Zealand, which had already forfeited its game against Kenya.
Today's New York Times
has this obituary of Robert K. Merton
, one of the most prominent sociologists of the last 100 years (link via Kieran Healy
). Merton added so many concepts to the modern sociological oeuvre that it would be hard to catalog them all. It would be fair to say, though, that he helped explicate the structural functionalism
that dominated much of twentieth-century American sociology.
Today, the bicentennial of
the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison
, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), would be a good time to reflect on judicial review.
UPDATE: The Washington Post had this timely piece today.
Sunday, February 23, 2003
Why isn't jazz
more gay-friendly; why are most gay people oblivious to jazz? This New York Times piece
(free registration required) asked some interesting questions (link via Shattered Buddha
With India's boycott
and turmoil in the region, the South Asian Federation Games—which I blogged about here
—may not go on
: Vancouver is still in the running to host the 2010 Winter Olympics, after voters there approved the city's Olympic bid
by a two-to-one margin.
If Samuel Pepys were around
today, he'd probably have a blog. This is what it might look like
(link via Kitchen Cabinet
America's Cup Doldrums
: What's up with the Hauraki Gulf
? There hasn't been enough wind
there in days.
UPDATE: And again....
Saturday, February 22, 2003
: I've been meaning to praise the heck out of The Office
, the BBC's brilliant comedy. Dean Allen of Textism
has beaten me to it
, though. So...what he said. Only more. If you live in the States, you can see The Office
on BBC America
: The surprising Irish team has defeated Italy
, 37-13, in the first Six Nations Cup
match of the weekend. Next up for Ireland, on March 8
, is defending champion France.
UPDATE: Thanks to the wonders of the internet, I just listened to the English defeat of Wales, 26-9, in the second game of the weekend. Wales, the one-time powerhouse that is now lightly regarded, put up a pretty good fight in the first half.
Shane Warne, one of Australia's
and the world's best cricketers, has been suspended
for one year because of a positive test for a banned diuretic. He will appeal. Warne has said that he ingested the diuretic, which his mother gave him, only to improve his appearance. Because the positive test occurred in January, Warne has not played for the Australian team at the Cricket World Cup
Friday, February 21, 2003
Only 20% of Danes
in a recent poll thought the United States was a well-functioning democracy
. If you have thoughts about that, please share them with me and your congressman.
And I'm guessing it won't be San Marino either
. I've been wondering
, as you know, where the next America's Cup defense will take place if the Swiss defeat New Zealand for the trophy
. Well, we now know it won't be Monaco
. That possibility truly hadn't even occurred to me.
Hell, it's a good story
. Is this anecdote cute
? I don't usually like cute
. But I like this. It's funny, and it's a tiny (tiny!) bit profound, but it's also probably cute
, too. Hmmm.
Sexism and Sumo?
Once again, Japan's Sumo Association
has decided not to allow
a female governor on the dohyo
to present the trophy at its Osaka tournament
. If you're a man of Greek ancestry who plays baseball
UPDATE: If you're a Greek Olympic organizer, IOC chief Jacques Rogge says you should get off your butt. Will the Athens Games be a huge fiasco?
If you're a woman of Greek ancestry
who plays softball, you might be able to live out your Olympic dream
. The Greeks—with no softball tradition—have an automatic berth in the Athens 2004 Games
, and they're looking for help.
The movement is big
. Here's another article about the IOC's report
on the lack of criminal influence in sports. The article also notes, at its end, that the IOC executive board voted to keep racewalking
, the three-day equestrian event
, and wrestling
on the Olympic program—at least through the 2008 Games in Beijing
. IOC president Jacques Rogge
believes the Summer Games have gotten too big, but the IOC hasn't been able to pick any sports to eliminate from the Games. Previously, softball
, and the modern pentathlon
got a reprieve through 2008. And if modern pentathlon is staying, I can't imagine what would go.
I was a little bit surprised that wrestling was ever one of the sports that might be dropped. I suppose its popularity is confined to a few countries, but wrestling—in both the Greco-Roman and freestyle versions—is one of the few Olympic sports that some countries, including Mongolia and Iran, participate in.
As for the modern pentathlon, well, it's a uniquely Olympic event, having been concocted by the founder of the Olympic Movement. It's just universally ignored. But, hey, I like it.
Thursday, February 20, 2003
: I think Kim of Fresh Hell
is one of the wittiest, smartest writers on the web
. So if she says that For Better or for Worse
is a cool comic strip, and she does
, well, it must be so. But I totally don't get it.
In a similar vein, can you believe there are people who still read Rex Morgan, M.D.?
Minnows and fish
: After Sri Lanka's thorough trouncing of Canada
, some are asking whether non-powerhouses like Canada really belong
in the Cricket World Cup
. Relatedly, Australia—a 2000-1(!) favorite—today defeated the lightly-regarded Dutch
Although I appreciate events that make all the world welcome, it doesn't seem right when the outcome of an event is affected by flukes occurring during noncompetitive matches.
The International Olympic Committee
has concluded that sport is largely free from the influence of organized crime. As this SI.com article indicates
, there have recently been a few indications to the contrary.
Wednesday, February 19, 2003
. A new book
gives national political appointees some practical advice about working with—and not harming—civil servants. I wonder how big an audience there is for such a book. While we're on the topic: If you're ever elected president, please remember that I'd make a helluva Secretary of the Interior
Remember when I was forgetful?
If not, see here
. Well, here's the cool post about hurling
that I couldn't locate once I was ready to blog. (I'd scrawled the site's address on a sticky note, and—imagine that—I actually knew what it was when the sticky note turned up.)
By the way, the author of the post—sociologist Kieran Healy—keeps a mighty tasty blog.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
: Kate of the Kitchen Cabinet
has favored me
with a response to my recent post about underdogs
. As she notes, there are some real sources of spectating pleasure to be mined when rooting for some favorites. There's the suspense in whether the dynasty can win again
and, similarly, in whether the superior athlete can accomplish a particular milestone. Waiting to see if the Bulls can threepeat
is definitely exciting, just as is the anticipation that builds when someone like Serena Williams
or Tiger Woods
gets close to a calendar-year Grand Slam. For some spectators, and particularly those who have preexisting identity ties to the favorite, these are sufficient pleasures. But if a spectator comes to a contest with no preexisting ties, something that may not happen all that often to the real fan
, the emotional attraction of the underdog may well be alluring.
When I used to test this idea with sociology classes, including an upper-level course that was popular with physical education students, there was always a decided minority—but always a minority—who gravitated toward the favorite, even in the absence of any preexisting ties to either competitor. I don't know Kate, but it could be that she falls into this category. In any event, it's an interesting phenomenon, and maybe I'd be researching it now if I hadn't bailed on academia for the big bucks of governmental service. It takes all kinds, of course, and life would be dull if everyone rooted for the same teams.
Random aside: Congrats to Kate for her citation in a federal appellate opinion.
: Predictably enough, India may not attend
the South Asian Sports Federation Games
to be held in Islamabad in a few weeks. The badminton
should be good either way, but the kabaddi
would definitely suffer.
Also, an International Olympic Committee inspection team has wrapped up a four-day visit to PyeongChang, South Korea--one of three cities bidding for the 2010 Winter Games. Inspection visits to Salzburg and Vancouver are still to come. South Korea has a good chance of getting the 2010 Games. It seems unlikely that the 2010 Games would go to Europe, with the 2006 Games already set for Turin. A plebiscite on Vancouver's bid will be held on February 22. There is opposition.
And I thought I had it bad.
I don't have snow in the bathroom
, at least.
Monday, February 17, 2003
A challenging challenger
: The Swiss have taken a 3-0 lead
over defender New Zealand in the America's Cup
. If the Swiss win, and it's looking like they will, where will they defend the title?
Stay tuned for more weather
. It finally stopped snowing
. I guess my neighborhood got over 20 inches. I spent the day, a holiday
, feeling claustrophobic and daydreaming of warmth
But, hey, tomorrow I get a snow day! (Unlike some poor souls, I'm not essential enough to have to showshoe in.) I feel like I'm eight again.
The Tiger Woods Question
: Kate, one of the Kitchen Cabinet
bloggers, asks why sports fans have such a hard time rooting for dynasties
and athletes who clearly outshine their peers. "Why must we always tear down?" she asks. "Why do we love to hate the best?"
This is actually something I've written about (with my mentor Eldon E. Snyder): Please pull out your copy of Volume 8 (c. 1991) of the Sociology of Sport Journal and turn to page 380, ok? It's not handy? Well, in short, the argument is that it's relatively risk-free to root for underdogs. When you root for the underdog, you invest little of yourself—and your intellect—in the outcome. If the underdog is defeated, you don't lose much, if any, self-respect. After all, the underdog shouldn't have won. If, however, the underdog should somehow manage a win, you're exhilarated. It's darn exciting, huh? You get goose bumps when Doug Flutie completes a long pass with no time remaining to give Boston College the win; when the U.S. hockey team defeats the Soviet Union at Lake Placid, causing Al Michaels to ruminate on miracles; when Senegal stuns the defending champions at the World Cup. It's big emotional bang for little or no emotional buck.
Conversely, when you root for the favorite—or, heaven help you, a dynasty—you tend to invest a little more of yourself in the outcome. You've expended some intellectual energy and decided that the 1978 Montreal Canadiens are clearly the tops in the NHL. (Or, perhaps, some of your very identity is based on being a Canadiens fan.) What happens when they, inevitably, win the Stanley Cup? Well, it's not all that exciting, is it? They were supposed to win; they were heavy favorites to win. It's nice, but it's not all that. And if your favorite should happen to lose? Well, you feel lousy, and you may even lose a touch of self-esteem. To sum up, rooting for the underdog entails little risk and the potential for huge excitement. By contrast, rooting for the favorite is pretty much a no-win proposition: You risk something, and—even if you didn't—there's very little chance of a huge emotional payoff. The cost-benefit analysis favors rooting for the underdog.
Given all this, why would a fan ever root for a favorite? Well, you do it because you have pre-existing ties to the favorite. You root for the Detroit Red Wings because you grew up in Detroit, or because you've had a huge crush on Brett Hull for ages, or because you got attached to the Wings years ago when they were the underdogs. In short, you root for non-underdogs in spite of the emotional attraction of rooting for the underdog.
I have another thought here, too. At some times and places, it's probably easier to tap into a particular culture's underdog ideologies. Americans, maybe, still love underdogs because (i) they were once a huge one themselves and (ii) the underdog ethos became embedded in popular mythology. Probably some cultures have more underdog ideologies than others to tap into. Since the United States has become the superpower, has it become easier to root for the Tiger Woodses of the sports world? You tell me.
In the end, I don't think I'd phrase things as negatively as Kate. In my opinion, it's not so much that underdog-rooters hate the best. It seems to me, instead, that fans of the underdog respect the top dog. They just crave the emotional rush they get when the underdog prevails. Who can blame them?
Sunday, February 16, 2003
Does it seem quaint to write a check?
It does to me
Does this mean I miss being a sociologist?
This entertaining Boston Globe
piece on fast food pits two strains of sociological thinking against one another. One strain, which focuses on increasing bureaucratization and international commodification (McDonaldization
, as theorist George Ritzer
calls it) in the world, notes—with some sadness—the spread of American-style fast-food chains around the world. The other strain, which focuses on resistance to commodification, notes how these chains must integrate themselves into local cultures to survive. So, on the one hand, there are now McDonald's
restaurants around the world; on the other hand, only a few of those restaurants feature McHuevo burgers
Despite what the Globe article and countless grad-school arguments may suggest, both paradigms describe something real, don't they? There's no need to choose.
New Zealand's last World War I veteran has died
. He was 105.
I'm surprised to be writing this
, but Switzerland enjoys a 2-0 lead
on New Zealand in the America's Cup
final. The third race in the best-of-nine final is set for Tuesday. Switzerland
is entirely landlocked, no?
Carol Channing took no part in this, I swear
. World No. 2 Venus Williams took out world No. 3 Kim Clijsters
, 6-2, 6-4, in the finals of an event in Antwerp on Sunday. For Clijsters
, the home-court advantage wasn't enough. If Williams
can win the Diamond Games tournament again in any of the next three years, she'll take home a $1 million diamond-encrusted trophy shaped like a racket. Really.
This is big news in the Southern Hemisphere
. New Zealand upset South Africa
today at the Cricket World Cup. The loss could cause the South African hosts to make an early exit from the tournament.
Unfortunately, I don't live in an actual ski lodge
. I've been trapped inside my apartment all day; snow just keeps falling and falling and falling. We may get 20 inches this
round. It certainly doesn't surprise me that this winter has been more severe in Philadelphia than in Anchorage
I have had plenty of time to read the newspaper today, though. In today's Philadelphia Inquirer, I particularly enjoyed stories on the Swedish government's determination to end its vestigial relationship with nobility; a school on the Blackfeet Reservation in Montana that hopes to save the tribe's language and culture; and a clutch of, well, radical knitters.
Also of note today: a Sunday Magazine feature on the unconventional dean of Drexel University's College of Media Arts and Design and the Inquirer art critic's review of the Matisse Picasso exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art. A springtime excursion to MoMA sounds awfully nice right about now.
Saturday, February 15, 2003
I must have hit my head and erased my memory
. Yesterday, I stumbled onto a great post about hurling
's blog. The post included a link to a picture from, I think, 1959, and it addressed what it says about Ireland that hurling is its national sport. Try as I might, though, today I can't remember whose blog it was and how I ended up there. This must be what middle age is like. Sigh. So, anyway, if you wrote the cool stuff about hurling, congrats. And if you find my memory somewhere on the street, please send it back to me....
: England has defeated defending champion France
, 25-17, on the first day of this year's Six Nations Cup
, the top all-European rugby union
event. Earlier in the day, Italy—hardly a power in rugby union—defeated Wales
, 30-22. You can get video highlights of both matches here
Burying the story?
I'm glad I reserved judgment
on this. Justice Douglas's legal claim to a spot in Arlington National Cemetery seems now to have been a viable one
: England was forced to forfeit
the Cricket World Cup match it declined to play in Zimbabwe. Meanwhile, in actual on-the-field action, defending champion Australia is looking strong
Just don't get me started on Ahmad Rashad, ok? As Reality Blurred noted
, most of the players' journals from ABC's Celebrity Mole Hawaii
were up for auction on eBay
, with the proceeds to go to charity. I've been a huge fan of all of the Mole
's iterations, and I thought the celebrity edition was particularly fun. But who exactly would pay $2,025
for the journal of winner Kathy Griffin
? And why did the journal of runner-up Erik von Detten
, the kid from Dinotopia
, earn a whopping $5,602
Pitchers and catchers
for my beloved Kansas City Royals
reported to spring training yesterday. Their first workout
is set for a couple of hours from now. For the first time ever, the Royals are holding spring training in Arizona
and playing in the Cactus League
It may be spring in Arizona, but it's snowing—again—here today.
Thursday, February 13, 2003
It's a loss (but only in the most obvious sense)
. Teresa Phillips became the first woman to coach a men's Division I basketball team
tonight. Her Tennessee State Tigers lost, 71-56, to Austin Peay. After tonight, Phillips will apparently return to her regular gig
as Tennessee State's athletic director.
A New Zealand murderer
has received a sentence that includes 33 years of parole ineligibility
. What's really incredible, at least for an American, is that this is the longest sentence ever imposed in New Zealand
Interested in Buddhism?
Think you ought to be
interested in Buddhism? Me, too. But this Slate piece
makes me think I should just leave Buddhism Without Beliefs
in the stack of unread books on my nightstand.
this New Yorker
piece on table tennis. It notes, among other things, how world-class players get no respect here
, probably because so many Americans think of the sport as an after-school time-killer. I guess I missed out, but I didn't have any childhood friends who played Ping-Pong in their basements. Of course, there aren't that many basements in my hometown
. (Yes, I know that's not the point.)
Quiet in Harare
: England decided not to play
its 2003 Cricket World Cup match set for Zimbabwe. There seems to be some question still whether England should be required to forfeit the match.
Recognizing that its season-ending championship
tournament was a colossal bore
last year, the women's tour has decided to try something new
. Or, at least, to borrow something good from the men's tour. I think a round-robin event will make fans happy.
Tuesday, February 11, 2003
Best in Show
: It's the Kerry blue terrier
. I was rooting for an underdog
, of course, the Ibizan hound
All the planets are in orbit again
. Cooped Up
is back and looking better than ever
. Good stuff.
. I agree with Pamie
that the phrase "You know what?" is usually a not-so-subtle way
of telling readers they don't know anything at all. I disagree, though, that "um" and "uh" are often just as bad. When I use "um,"
it's a self-conscious and halfway apologetic way of revealing that I'm struggling with what to write and am probably about to use the most obvious word or phrase choice known to humanity. So don't judge me too harshly, ok? I've definitely seen—and received—the self-important "um" that Pamie describes, but I more often see the nerdy "um" that I favor.
Whatever you think of "um," you should definitely pre-order Pamie's book.
The other "curious omission"
: In early January, I blogged
about Spain's decision to select Los lunes al sol
, instead of Pedro Almodóvar's Hable con ella (Talk to Her)
, as its contender for this year's Oscar for best foreign-language film. Well, Los lunes
didn't get a nomination, while Almodóvar's highly regarded film walked away with two nominations
in mainstream, premier categories—best director and best original screenplay. I'm guessing the Spanish film academy is feeling a little uncomfortable right about now.
Another foreign film, Mexico's Y tu mamá también, captured a nomination in the screenplay category, giving that category an unusual international flair.
Monday, February 10, 2003
I'm right, and I guess I'm psychic, too
. My theory
for the "curious omission" of Stefan Edberg from this year's class of International Tennis Hall of Fame
inductees may actually bear weight, according to another wonderful Tennis Mailbag
column from SI.com's Jon Wertheim. Wertheim also links Chris Evert's departure from NBC with Mary Carillo's arrival there. I unintentionally linked the two
commentators in my post about Evert's career change.
Finally, Wertheim's column has good information on the Croatian Davis Cup hero Ivan Ljubicic as well as Martina Hingis's retreat—not retirement!—from the game.
Punishable by a fine of Five Dollars
: Another great resource of OSCN is that it contains online versions of all Oklahoma statutes
, including my personal favorite
Interstate Rivalry? How Appealing
spotlighted some top state-court websites today
. I visited his choices, and they are
awfully nice sites. (I particularly liked being able to listen to oral arguments of cases before the North Dakota Supreme Court
.) Still, you can call me parochial
(ouch!), but I think OSCN
, the website of Oklahoma's state courts, is one of the best. Not only does the site have useful information about the state's three appellate courts
(and beaucoup "lower" courts), but it houses online versions of all
of those courts' published opinions
since, well, time began. That means you can view Oklahoma Supreme Court decisions from 1890 and Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals decisions since statehood. Oh, and you can view
decisions of the Court of Appeals of Indian Territory, too.
You'll get a gold star from me if you know what court directly reviewed decisions of the Court of Appeals of Indian Territory.
I've been meaning for days
to blog about the 2003 Cricket World Cup
now being hosted by South Africa. There has been a lot of off-the-field news, mostly relating to the organizers' decision to utilize venues in Kenya and Zimbabwe. First, New Zealand decided not to play in Nairobi
, citing safety concerns. (Kenya, of course, was the site of a terrorist bombing in November.) Then the focus turned to whether England would play in Zimbabwe
, given safety concerns there as well as Britain's call for Commonwealth
sanctions against Zimbabwean president Robert Mugabe. That still seems to be undecided, although the English players—who have received death threats—are apparently balking
at making the trip to Harare.
I wish I could blog about on-the-field events, too. Even after reading this witty explanation of cricket, though, I still don't think I understand things well enough to write intelligently about actual matches. Sigh.
Sunday, February 09, 2003
Did I start the Waddling Thunder
feud? After all, I seem to have played a role
in "introducing" the two. But it's not really much of a feud, just a good hearty debate. And, hey, I won't be your Yoko Ono
, anyway. (No, I have no idea what that really means, but I'll take just about any chance to work in a Dar Williams
Can you stand
one final post (for now) about the Davis Cup? Three things strike me about the non-U.S. results. First, the Swiss come-from-behind win
was awfully impressive, coming against the favored Dutch in Holland. Second, Gustavo Kuerten
seems to be back from injury. He won a singles match and a doubles match for Brazil
, falling only in a five-set match to Jonas Bjorkman
on the final day. But for Bjorkman, Kuerten would have nearly singlehandedly carried his team through to the quarterfinals. Finally, I have to say how impressed I was by the Argentine team
and, in particular, by David Nalbandian
. After his unexpected run to the finals of last year's Wimbledon
, Nalbandian could have settled back into obscurity. (Anyone remember Chris Lewis?) He made the quarters at this year's Australian Open, and he participated in two of Argentina's five(!) wins over Germany. I'm a fan.
How did I miss this
? The first notes in a 639-year piece for organ
were played last week (link via Dave Barry's Blog
). It's a John Cage
piece, of course.
? In the days and weeks ahead, American tennis fans will undoubtedly try to place blame for the debacle in Croatia
. We simply didn't field our best team, and that—of course—is nothing new. Our best team would have included Andre Agassi
and Andy Roddick
and, probably, a team of doubles specialists. Roddick is injured, and that's more than a fair reason not to play. Agassi, though, simply opted not to play. It's certainly easy to see why the 32-year-old Agassi is selective about what he puts his body through these days. But I might have thought that a sticky first-round Davis Cup match, at a time when other top American players were unavailable, would have seemed important enough to Agassi—who was once a stalwart
for the U.S. Davis Cup team—to play.
After Roddick and Agassi, the likely candidates are Pete Sampras and players like James Blake and Mardy Fish. Sampras has played for the U.S. team more recently than Agassi, but it's no secret that he's not in top form right now. That, I think, put the onus more squarely on Agassi.
Could a U.S. team led by Agassi and Blake have defeated the Croatians? I think there's no doubt that the answer to that question is yes. Agassi, who is tops in the world right now, surely would have won two singles match. And, as we know, Blake was able to win one singles match. With a competent doubles team (how about the Bryans, currently ranked in the Top 10?), instead of two singles players forced to play together, the U.S. might have even won four of the five rubbers.
What is the role of Captain Patrick McEnroe in all this? I have no idea. Over the years, top players have evaded the entreaties of several different captains. If there is anyone who could have gotten Agassi to play in Zagreb, he should be captain. My only real quibble with Patrick McEnroe—aside from his often vapid work as a color commentator on TV—is his repeated strategy of whipping up unlikely doubles pairings for Davis Cup ties. But it's hard to imagine how any "real" U.S. doubles team would have made a difference this year in Croatia.
It's all over
. Croatia has won the Davis Cup
tie with the United States. In the first of the reverse singles matches
, Ivan Ljubicic—who won every match he played—defeated James Blake, 6-3, 6-7, 6-4, 6-3. Tiny Croatia
moves on to the Davis Cup quarterfinals; it will meet heavyweight Spain
in April. The U.S. will have to survive a relegation match in September to remain in the top group in 2004.
In the largely irrelevant final match of the tie with Croatia, the U.S. has replaced Mardy Fish with Taylor Dent.
UPDATE: Croatian Mario Ancic defeated Dent, 7-6, 3-6, 7-6, in the final match, shortened to three sets because of its irrelevancy. The third-set tiebreaker went to 12-10.
Saturday, February 08, 2003
Too much too soon
? Former No. 1 Martina Hingis has all but formally retired
, it seems. Hingis
was just 16 when she won her first of five Grand Slam singles titles in 1997.
Davis Cup News
: The Croatian team of Goran Ivanisevic and Ivan Ljubicic has just defeated
James Blake and Mardy Fish, 3-6, 4-6, 7-6, 6-4, 6-4. The match—they call it a rubber in Davis Cup
, strangely—was all even at 4-all in the fifth set when the Croatians broke the Americans at love. Ljubicic served out the match. Now both Blake and Fish must win their reverse singles matches tomorrow for the U.S. to advance. That seems terribly unlikely.
UPDATE: Ivanisevic's effort was darn-near heroic. Wily, indeed.
Friday, February 07, 2003
The U.S. Davis Cup team
today split the first-day singles
in its tie with Croatia. As I expected, James Blake
defeated Mario Ancic, while Ivan Ljubicic
handled American Mardy Fish. Both were straight-set affairs
. The doubles tomorrow will be hugely important. If the Croatians win (and, as I suggested yesterday
, that's not at all unlikely), then it will probably come down to the Fish-Ancic reverse singles on Sunday. Fish is probably not even a better singles player
Ancic will have the hometown crowd behind him. In Davis Cup
, home-field advantage is often key. I'm back to being pessimistic
about the American team's chances.
I am so over winter
. My neighborhood got about eight inches of snow
overnight and into early afternoon today. I need a warm getaway. Soon.
Thursday, February 06, 2003
: The Israeli-Pakistani doubles team of Amir Hadad and Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi today garnered the ATP's Arthur Ashe Humanitarian Award
. There wasn't a better story in the game last year than their unlikely partnership.
Just when she was getting good
in the booth, Chris Evert leaves NBC
. Random aside: Mary Carillo is still the best
commentator in the game.
I'm all about the tennis today
. And probably all through the weekend, too. Tomorrow, the U.S. Davis Cup
tie against Croatia begins. The U.S. is not fielding its best team (do we ever?), but I'm not as pessimistic as I was
. James Blake leads the team
, and he should
win his two singles matches. Mardy Fish
can surely win just one of his singles matches to clinch the tie. I'm not optimistic about the chances of the Blake-Fish doubles team, though. Wily veteran Goran Ivanisevic
could easily be a force of nature in the Saturday doubles.
Tuesday, February 04, 2003
Ok, my interest is piqued
. I've praised
Jon Wertheim's weekly Tennis Mailbag column for CNNSI.com
before. This week's column is especially good, too. But I'm pointing it out here because Wertheim notes the "curious omission"
of tennis great Stefan Edberg
from this year's class of International Tennis Hall of Fame
inductees. (The 2003 class included Boris Becker, Nancy Richey, and Françoise Durr
.) I hadn't even realized that Edberg was eligible this year.
Perhaps the Hall just didn't want to upstage either Becker or Edberg with the other superstar's presence? Both clearly deserve spots in the Hall. Each captured six Grand Slam titles and was hugely popular in the 1980s and 1990s. I'll be interested to learn what the story is.
UPDATE: An Edberg fan site is, um, not happy about the "snub." The situation truly is perplexing.
Yes, I'm now meta-blogging here
. In an interesting post, Eugene Volokh, the ringmaster at The Volokh Conspiracy
, defends his blog's multi-blogger philosophy
. When I first started visiting Volokhia regularly, I was a bit baffled by all of the different bloggers and couldn't quite figure out their relationships, if any, to one another. (That was before there were 11
coconspirators!) With some time, of course, it all started making better sense. And there is
something to what Volokh has to say: Most visitors are probably looking for sites that have a good quantity of high-quality posts every day. I can definitely see that it's easier to produce a site with good quantity and quality when there are several contributors who can interact. That said, though, having gotten a pretty good feel for most of the various coconspirators, I'm pretty uninterested in what anybody there, save Eugene
, has to say. But I have no illusion that I'm a representative visitor.
Monday, February 03, 2003
I promised just a couple of days ago
to write more about
whether people end up in law school because they've already lost idealism or whether law school causes law students to lose idealism. It's some of both, of course. Alice at a mad tea-party
had a few relevant thoughts
over the weekend. I may still write more about this at some point, I think, but here's what I was thinking. First, some people go to law school because they aren't passionate about any other particular career goal. Among this group are some
who are genuinely interested in social issues and current events but nevertheless have no real life plans. (That was me, by the way.) Second, law school itself has a way of purging some of the passion from law students. There is something about systematically immersing yourself in cases and study that causes the world to look very, um, legalistic and narrow. What once would have seemed a straightforward issue of right vs. wrong
becomes, after law school, a question of what the correct "answer" to a legal question is—on the basis of precedent, history, policy, and the like. At a minimum, the good law student is able to see how different persons might reasonably
resolve the same issue in different ways. From there, it's a short cognitive distance to seeing several different resolutions of an issue to be morally equivalent/interchangeable. In the end, I think, grown-up lawyers often do seem a little bit detached or jaded. As a group, we began with less direction than we might have, and then we were exposed to a process that stripped some of our idealism away. The question for grown-up lawyers, then, is whether the result is something to be happy about and, if not, whether idealism can be rekindled.
The Collapse of Inconvenience
: Yesterday's Boston Globe Magazine
included this very thorough look
(link via Arts & Letters Daily
) at Google
. My favorite part: A professor of culture and communication called attention to the "collapse of inconvenience" precipitated by the search engine. Before Google, there was embarrassing information about many of us somewhere
out there, but it was too inconvenient for acquaintances to find. Now that much of this information is there for anyone to view, some realize just how much they'd relied on that inconvenience.
By the way, Google sounds like a great place to work, doesn't it?
Did you catch Monster.com's Super Bowl commercial
? (If not, you can find it here
.) Well, the American Trucking Associations
did not see humor
(scroll down to the third story).
RANDOM ASIDE: My favorite Super Bowl Commercial was the Budweiser spot featuring the zebra checking out the instant replay for the Clydesdales. It's also available here. And, hey, that was also the top pick in USA Today's Ad Meter.
: Did Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas
pad his résumé? A new biography says yes
UPDATE: Here's a picture of Justice Douglas's marker at Arlington National Cemetery. The new biography suggests that the marker contains a misstatement. I'm going to reserve judgment.
Sam Heldman's fine blog Ignatz
is sporting a new look
today. Heldman says it may be temporary, so check it out now
. I sort of like it, but—on my monitor, anyway—the archived posts look a little busy.
I thoroughly enjoy Ignatz, despite its focus on labor law—something I never really encounter in either my work or my personal life. The blog is well-written, often provocative, and occasionally funny. (No particular endorsement, or non-endorsement, of Heldman's legal views is intended here, of course.) It takes me back to what was one of my favorite courses in law school. (Thanks, Professor Friedman.) In fact, after my second year of law school, I had a chance to intern at a National Labor Relations Board regional office. I opted for something completely different. If I'd chosen the NLRB office, Ignatz might be a lot more relevant to my work life today....
The bad news about the space shuttle
clouded my weekend (and yours, too, I'm sure). But I did find some other news in Sunday's Philadelphia Inquirer
to be of interest. As someone who commutes on an Amtrak
-owned track, this article on the railroad's president and financial crisis
was information I needed to read. I remembered that Serbia had had two inconclusive presidential elections last year, but I didn't really know what that would mean for its presidency. The answer: Serbia's parliamentary speaker, a 37-year-old woman, has taken over as acting president
. If you've been paying any attention at all to my Sunday reading habits, you know that I enjoy the Sunday feature on the "unusual" locale. Well, this week, the locale was French Guiana
. French Guiana, an "overseas department" of—duh—France, is a place I've never given much thought. The article prompted me to price flights to Cayenne
. It actually seemed to be more feasible and cost-effective to fly via Paris than Miami. Unfortunately, I doubt any of my usual traveling partners would be game. Any other volunteers?
On the sports page, I enjoyed this look at the possibility that LPGA superstar Annika Sorenstam may play with the men at a PGA event.
Saturday, February 01, 2003
That last post reminded me
to check on the dates for the Westminster Kennel Club
dog show. This year's top event in dogdom happens on February 10-11. USA Network's coverage
of the show is always strangely compelling.
This post is sponsored by the big puppy who lives with me
: The New Yorker
has a thoughtful essay
precipitated by a recent book about dogs—or, really, the history of dogs. The book is Stanley Coren's The Pawprints of History
. I have a feeling that Larissa MacFarquhar's review might actually be more interesting than the book itself. (link via Arts & Letters Daily
I swear I'm not as burned out as this post suggests. Waddling Thunder
, a law school blogger, began a post this week
with a great quote from The Simpsons
: I don't believe in anything anymore! I'm going to law school.
There's quite a bit of truth in that Simpsons quote, I think. Probably more than Thunder wants to believe. When I have more time (i.e., when it's not the middle of the night), I'll try to write more about this. I definitely think it's true, though, that (i) many good lawyers ended up in law school mostly because they had no other real life missions and (ii) the experience of law school somehow leaves many of those lawyers feeling less passionate about social issues.
11/01/2002 - 12/01/2002
12/01/2002 - 01/01/2003
01/01/2003 - 02/01/2003
02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003
03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003
04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003
05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003
06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003
07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003
08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003
09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]